注释（第4/9页）
[56] Appian, Civil Wars 1.6, trans. Carter, 4; Appian, Auncient Historie and Exquisite Chronicle of the Romane Warres, title page.
第三章 非内部的内战 17世纪
[1] hobbes, On the Citizen, ed. Tuck and Silverthorne, 4.
[2] 关于莎士比亚对人道主义的观点，参见Armitage, Condren, and Fitzmaurice,Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought; Skinner, Forensic Shakespeare。
[3] Burke, “Survey of the Popularity of Ancient Historians, 1450—1700.”
[4] Jensen, “Reading Florus in Early Modern England”; Jensen, Reading the Roman Republic in Early Modern England, 56–73.
[5] Schuhmann, “Hobbes’s Concept of History,” 3– 4; Hobbes, Behemoth; or, The Long Parliament, 52.
[6] Grafton, What Was History?, 194 – 95; see Wheare, Method and Order of Reading Both Civil and Ecclesiastical Histories, trans. Bohun, 77–78, on “thebody of the Roman History … the Picture of which in Little is most Artfully drawn by our L. Annaeus Florus.”
[7] Statutes of the University of Oxford Codified in the Year 1636 Under the Authority of Archbishop Laud, 37.
[8] Eutropius, Eutropii historiæ romanæ breviarum; Phillipson, Adam Smith, 18,plates 2–3.
[9] Mac Cormack, On the Wings of Time, 15, 72, 76.
[10] Garcilaso de la Vega, Historia general del Peru trata el descubrimiento del; y como lo ganaron los Españoles.
[11] Montaigne, Essays Written in French by Michael Lord of Montaigne, trans.Florio, 547.
[12] hadfield, Shakespeare and Republicanism, 103–29, has called this tetralogy“Shakespeare’s Pharsalia.”
[13] Bentley, Shakespeare and Jonson, 1:112; Donaldson, “Talking with Ghosts:Ben Jonson and the English Civil War.”
[14] Shakespeare’s Appian; Logan, “Daniel’s Civil Wars and Lucan’s Pharsalia”;Logan, “Lucan-Daniel-Shakespeare.”
[15] Daniel, The First Fowre Bookes of the Civile Wars Between the Two Houses of Lancaster and Yorke, sig. B[i]r.
[16] Norbrook, Writing the English Republic, 24.
[17] Shapiro, “ ‘Metre Meete to Furnish Lucans Style’ ”; Gibson, “Civil War in 1614”; Norbrook, “Lucan, Thomas May, and the Creation of a Republican Literary Culture”; Norbrook, Writing the English Republic, 43–50.
[18] May, History of the Parliament of England Which Began November the Third,MDCXL, sig. A3v; Pocock, “Thomas May and the Narrative of Civil War.”
[19] Milton, Paradise Lost; Hale, “Paradise Lost”; Norbrook, Writing the English Republic, 438 – 67, 443.
[20] Mc Dowell, “Towards a Poetics of Civil War,” 344.
[21] Filmer, Patriarcha, title page, quoting Lucan, Bellum civile 3.145 – 46 (“Libertas…Populi, quem regna coercent / Libertate perit”); Hobbes, Behemoth: The History of the Causes of the Civil-Wars of England, title page, adapting Lucan,Bellum civile 1.1–2 (“Bella per Angliacos plusquam civilia campos, / Jusque datum sceleri loquiumur”); Hobbes, Behemoth; or, The Long Parliament, 90,92.
[22] Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Extrait du projet de paix perpétuelle de monsieur l’abbé de Saint-Pierre, title page (quoting Lucan, Bellum civile 4.4–5); Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men, in Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, trans. Gourevitch, 185 (quoting Lucan, Bellum civile 1.376 –78).
[23] Lucan, Pharsale de M. A. Lucain, trans. Chasles and Greslou, 1:xvii (quoting Lucan, Bellum civile 4.579).
[24] 参见，例如Mason, ed., The Darnton Debate。
[25] “Intestinae Simultates,” in Whitney, Choice of Emblemes and Other Devises, 7.
[26] Seaward, “Clarendon, Tacitism, and the Civil Wars of Europe.”
[27] Grotius, De Rebus Belgicis, 1.
[28] Corbet, Historicall Relation of the Military Government of Gloucester, sig. A2v.
[29] Biondi, “Civill Warrs of England,” trans. Henry, Earl of Monmouth; Biondi, History of the Civill Warres of England, Betweene the Two Houses of Lancaster and Yorke, trans. Henry, Earl of Monmouth; Davila, Historie of the Civill Warres of France, trans. Cotterell and Aylesbury; Adams, Discourses on Davila.
[30] Guarini, Il Pastor Fido, trans. Fanshawe, 303 –12.
[31] Sandoval, Civil Wars of Spain in the Beginning of the Reign of Charls the 5t,Emperor of Germanie and King.
[32] Samuel Kem, The Messengers Preparation for an Address to the King (1644),quoted in Donagan, War in England, 1642—1649, 132; compare Robert Doughty, “Charge to the Tax Commissioners of South Erpingham, North Erpingham, North Greenhoe, and Hold Hundreds” (Feb. 1664), in Notebook of Robert Doughty, 1662—1665, 123: “our late uncivil civil wars.”
[33] Davila, History of the Civil Wars of France, trans. Cotterell and Aylesbury, sig.A2r.
[34] Dugdale, Short View of the Late Troubles in England. Compare also Adamson,“Baronial Context of the English Civil War,”更多详情参见Adamson, Noble Revolt。
[35] Larrère, “Grotius et la distinction entre guerre privé et guerre publique.”
[36] Grotius, Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, 50 (“aut civile in partemeiusdem reipublicae: aut externum, in alius, cuius species est quod sociali dicitur”). 格劳秀斯关于罗马法的叙述，参见Straumann, Roman Law in the State of Nature。
[37] Grotius, Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, 80 (“bella Christianorumesse civilia, quasi vero totius Christianus Orbis una sit republica”), referring to Vázquez de Menchaca, Controversiarum illustrium…libri tres.
[38] Grotius, Rights of War and Peace 1.3.1, 1:240.
[39] Ibid., 1.4.19.1, 1:381, quoting Plutarch’s Life of Brutus and Cicero’s Second Philippic.
[40] Rousseau, The Social Contract (1762), in Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, 42– 43, 44 – 45.
[41] hobbes, Leviathan, 3:850.
[42] Thomas Hobbes, De Corpore 1.7, in Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, 190(“causa igitur belli civilis est, quod bellorum ac pacis causa ignoratur”), 191.
[43] hobbes, On the Citizen 1.12, 29 –30.
[44] Ibid., 11–12.
[45] hobbes to Cavendish, July 1645, in Hobbes, Correspondence,1:120.
[46] hobbes, On the Citizen, 82, 124 (“et bellum civile nascitur”), 149.
[47] Ibid., 15.
[48] 背景介绍，特别参见Kelsey, “Ordinance for the Trial of Charles I”; Kelsey,“Trial of Charles I”; Holmes, “Trial and Execution of Charles I”。
[49] Donagan, War in England, 1642—1649, 130.
[50] Orr, “Juristic Foundation of Regicide.”
[51] “An Act of the Commons of England Assembled in Parliament for Erecting a High Court of Justice, for the Trying and Judging of Charles Stuart, King of England” ( Jan. 6, 1649), in Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum,1642—1660, ed. Firth and Rait, 1:1253 –54 (my emphasis). Heath, Chronicle of the Late Intestine War in the Three Kingdomes of England, Scotland, and Ireland, 194 – 95, and “The Act Erecting a High Court of Justice for the King’s Trial” ( Jan. 6, 1649), in Gardiner, Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625—1660, 357, have “civil war” in place of “cruel War,” but this is not attested in, for example, “An Ordinance of the Commons in England in Parliament Assembled with a List of the Commissioners & Officers of the Said Court by Them Elected” ( Jan. 3, 1649), British Library E.536(35), fol. 1r, or in[ John Nalson], A True Copy of the Journal of the High Court of Justice, for the Tryal of K. Charles I, 2.